9 Reasons To Reject Vegetarianism

By  | 

Let’s be reliable: eating meat is an objectively terrible thought. It causes disastrous disasters in the developing world, has been linked to cancer and ’s high-priced. Yet, for all the logical arguments against it, some of us simply ca’t give upwards our carnivorous habits. Show us a cross section of our disease-ridden intestine and we’ll reveal you a succulent steak simply begging to be eaten. Show us a slaughterhouse and we’ll ask for fork and a knife. It may seem callous, but we’ll just give up our bacon when you pry it from our cold, dead hands—and here’s why:

Our Bodies Are Made For Meat

Screen Shot 2013-06-05 At 2.24.30 Pm

Because of the wonders of development, we humans can live just fine on a meat-free diet. But that does’t mean we’re natural vegetarians. Far from it: as far back as 2003, scientists had confirmed our ancestors were eating meat up to 2.5 million years ago. To put it differently, that succulent slab of bbq is’t some idol of modern decadence; there are lots of other hints also, and it’s part of our traditional diet. Our bodies lack most of the gear you’d connect with herbivores. For example, we do’t have four stomachs, any skill or the kind of complicated intestinal tracts leaf-eaters own. Our teeth are clearly designed to manage meat and non-meat diets. And a great job also, because…

Meat Made Us


From a purely rational standpoint, there are quite a few oddities about us people. For starters, our brains apparently should’t be this large. Brain size increases with body size, if you look across primate species: people are outliers that are noticeable. Subsequently there’s the additional sophistication of our brains, which are so full of neurons than there are stars in the universe they’re probably effective at holding more individual ideas. What makes us special? According to one study that is 2011, it’s our desire for meat.

Seriously: research workers from Spain identified indications of malnutrition in a kid’s skull dating from 1.5 million years ago, consistent with a meat-deficient diet. What’s fascinating about this is it implies we were so used to eating meat back our brains could’t grow without it—a theory supported by other evidence that links the amount of calories and primate brain sophistication. The likely candidate for our calorific diets is meat since we did’t start cooking our food until long after our brains went supernova. Because we initially ate other creatures significance we’re just effective at making rational alternatives like vegetarianism.

Other Primates Eat Meat


One argument frequently put forward for going vegetarian is that people are the only primates. Like using the net to moan about steakhouses it must be abnormal. But guess what? It’s not not only true; it’s around as scientific as striking on biology in the face.

Back in 1960, Jane Goodall discovered chimps eating and hunting other creatures in the wild. In the past few years since, it’s been demonstrated that particular chimp communities eat as much as one ton of meat per annum. To put it differently, they’re less indulging occasional cravings than they’re taking part in the chimpanzee equivalent of Man V. Food. But they use the slaughtered meat and ‘political’ edge over one another. So, to recap: our evolutionary cousins love a great steak they whore themselves out to get it.

Meat Can Be Sustainable

Cow Grazing

One of many huge reasons for giving up meat is the overwhelming environmental impact of transport, say, a ball of dead cow midway across the world. So if you’re into environmentalism, dropping meat should be a no brainer, right?

Not quite. While our present version of transport is around as environmentally friendly as a forest fire, it does’t need to be this way. See, livestock—handled correctly—can be used to do lots of things that would need a heck-load of fossil fuel. As an example, while additionally demanding little in the way of substances and pesticides to grow to an edible size grazing animals can help cycle nutrients and support in property management. Not only that, but a single cow slaughtered on a modest farm can feed its owners. So it’s not meat itself which is the problem, so much as our present supply chain.

Damage to the Environment


In our modern age, it’s required as read that eating meat is a larger planet killer than chowing down on tofu. But that’s not consistently true. As an example, compare organically raised animals with industrially produced tofu. The quantities of land desired are greater, picking and the treatment of the soya includes more fossil fuels, and the end product must be sent great distances if your home is someplace like Britain—where the climate is not truly, truly good for meat substitutes that are growing. Just place: that tasteless tofu hamburger you’re driving down to maintain our planet’s future may really be more atmosphere-frying than the tasty hunk of steak being eaten by that smug bastard across the table from you.

It May Reduce Aggression


There are specific mental characteristics among people that look so clear we should’t want a study to show them. One is that violence is triggered by exposure to weapons. Another is that meat-eaters are more competitive than vegetarians. Nevertheless, a group of scientists decided to look into the meat/aggression problem anyhow—and what they discovered turns common sense on its head.

Researchers found that thinking about steak might really reduce aggression in people by exposing guys to images of red meat subsequently putting them in a place of power over another area. Noone’s actually got any thought — beyond linking it to ‘evolution’—but the decision appears valid. Thus, while we may envision a rabid steak-eater to be more violence-prone than a man who lives off lentils and soy beans; the reverse may be accurate.

It Does’t Need To Hurt Creatures


Obviously, among the ‘huge’ arguments against eating meat is that it’s unkind. You look at it, cramming a group of chickens in a cage until they fat to stand and feeding them is’t an especially nice thing to do. There’s no getting around if you give the animal the greatest life possible. So it’s simple to see why some folks simply flat out refuse to eat meat.

Just that’s around to transform. Because of Dutch scientist Willem van Eelen, we at the phase where hamburgers can grow in a laboratory. Slow down and read that we improved as a species we can grow a hunk of cow in a laboratory without ever really including a living cow. Now, the technology is too expensive for mass production—the first laboratory-grown hamburger price $300,000 to make and tasted just ‘fairly great that is ’. But we’re possibly just a decade or two away from a world where bacon, sausages, steak and veal cutlets can be created without harming an individual creature.

It Could Save the Planet

U Bar Wi Cows

Go for a walk in the countryside and opportunities are—unless you live near a National Park— that is nothing like it was intended by nature. To destruction, creatures belonging to our ancestors grazed compact natural woods for thousands of years, leading to the great large open spaces we currently connect with ‘being outside’. And while it may look sorta depressed, this slow motion deforestation is really only what we want. See, if the state determines to go green’ and gets its act together, we’re gonna want as much open space for solar panels and wind farms as we can get. Understand the most eco friendly manner for keeping such places? Yep: grazing livestock. This is’t only me supposing British ‘eco warrior’ Simon Fairlie splendidly claimed that rearing livestock is vital for raising and creating a really-sustainable world. And what do we finally do with all this livestock that is vital? That’s correct: it is eaten by us.

Meat’s Delicious


OK—I acknowledge this is of a point. But let’s be fair: a tremendous quantity vegetarian v. carnivore web war comes down to this basic fact. For all we compose long list posts defending our selections and discuss protein, most of us meat-eaters only essentially like the flavor. Does that make us callous, wrong folks? Well, perhaps kind of. But we live in a world that’s an ethical minefield—every single day we log onto computers produced by tax-dodging multinationals using sweatshop labour; wear clothing made by virtual slaves in third world nations; give a large chunk of our paychecks to a sociopathic authorities; and usually reap the benefits of living in a state subsidized by the unethical treatment of most of the remaining part of the planet. If eating a hunk of bacon each day is what it takes to get me through this headache-inducing liberal guilt trip, then so be it.

Morris M.

Morris is a freelance writer and recently-qualified teacher, still naively expecting to make a difference in his pupils” lives. You can send your helpful and less-than-helpful remarks to his e-mail, or see with some of the other sites that hire him.


[adinserter block="6"]